I've been thinking a lot since last week's discussion about rural poverty and lack of access to services. This issue is not news to me (or, I'm sure, most of us). My parents both grew up in rural Maine, one in a farming community where probably 80% of the people are related by blood or marriage, and another in a town that was centered around Bass Shoe until Bass began shipping jobs south and across the Pacific. I am also reminded of the disparity every time I field a call on the Alzheimer's Association Helpline from someone in Washington County, Aroostook County, Pistcataquis County (whose low population density qualifies it as a "frontier"), who desperately needs caregiver support and other services that simply aren't available within 2 hours (or even 3) from their home because our agency, like so many others, simply can't afford to staff multiple offices in Maine.
It's loosely in that context that I wanted to share an interesting conversation I had earlier this week with a colleague at my internship, about a "Fresh Air" podcast with Kevin Carey, author of The End Of College: Creating The Future Of Learning And The University Of Everywhere. Casey believes college in its current form merely serves to perpetuate privilege--with tuition for a bachelor's degree at a private institution often exceeding a quarter million dollars over four years, it's not hard to see his point. Certainly, there are exceptions, including my cousin's daughter, who grew up in that aforementioned farming town in rural Maine and received a full scholarship to Yale, where she recently graduated with a degree in political science (but I digress).
In his interview, Casey talks about his experience of taking a class on EdX, which offers free online courses on a wide array of subjects. EdX was originally started as a partnership between Harvard and MIT to create free, open access to the same curriculum and classes their students take (and pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for); participating universities now include dozens of institutions in the US and around the world. Casey himself decided to take a biology class that is required of all first-year MIT students, whom one would presume to be some of the brightest minds in the US (and the world). This is not a watered-down free version--it is the same class, with the same lectures, assignments and final exam that is required of all first-year MIT students, whom one would presume to be some of the brightest minds in the US (and the world). Casey was proud to earn a final grade of 87/B in the class, which was taught by someone who was involved with the Human Genome Project (i.e., no slouch!). But what he found most interesting is that, among the thousands of people who took the class, only about 100 earned a perfect score on the exam--one of those was a teenager in Mongolia. As he notes, this kid was literally about as far away, geographically (and demographically/socioeconomically, I'd guess) from MIT as anyone on planet earth...yet he had the same intellectual ability and potential (perhaps more) than many students who are fortunate enough to be able to attend one of the world's most prestigious universities. In fact, that same kid ended up becoming Mongolia's first-ever student at MIT. Pretty amazing.
I find it incredibly exciting to think of the potential a system like EdX has to create opportunities for people in rural areas--whether a world away or right here in Maine--to access a world-class education and feel empowered to imagine possibilities for their futures that may never have seemed realistic before.
Very interesting Jen. It reminds me too of the income equality divide at high schools as well, which I feel personally torn about, having attending a private high school myself. I remember having a discussion with a friend in college who said she would never send her child to a private high school because it just perpetuates inequality. I see that point for sure, but at the same time, I know that I was failing at my public middle school: I was bullied and my self esteem was pretty much zero. I went from being very bright and engaged to just trying to scrape by. So my parents decided to send me to an all girls prep school and I absolutely flourished and went on to get my BA and here I am getting my MSW. Education is certainly one of those hot button issues, but I think having discussions around this topic are so important!
ReplyDeleteThis is such a critical issue and very relevant for social worker practice. My daughter spoke to my policy class about net neutrality and that is is a civil rights issue of our time, one of the "have and have nots". It was so informative and she emphasized how it has particular implications for rural communities. I also read a review of this book, and while I am a fan of a range of learning options, I think making higher ed affordable is critical and preparing students for higher ed is also another complicated wicked problem. There are so many possibilities. For sure this is an equity issue. Rural communities are definitely challenging new approaches for social work practice.
ReplyDeleteHi Jen,
ReplyDeleteVery interesting post! Accessibility is such a big issue. It’s fascinating to think about programs like you mentioned and the potential for good they can have. I’ve always thought about the debate in society about who deserves to have access to….fill in the blank verses who doesn’t deserve…fill in the blank. Ideally, if those that need services the most could be reached, imagine the potential that could be realized. But there is always a road blocks that get in the way of the help that is needed.